On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:34:26 +0200 Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: > > due to massive code duplication in netqmail, qmail-ldap, > > qmail-mysql, mini-qmail and other 3-rd party applications for qmail > > i have started to move functionality into a first qmail.eclass > > draft. > > I already proposed moving the prime functionality into an eclass and > it was refused back then. qmail-mysql and qmail-ldap may get removed > soon. qmail-ldap will not be removed for sure, since i maintain it currently. > > And as the netqmail ebuild maintainer, I want the ebuild to be as > simple as possible, that is, no external dependencies where possible. so, you suggest it is a better way to duplicate tons of code in 4 ebuilds? > > > Attached is the eclass and a sample how to use it with netqmail. > > It seems like you aren't interested in communication with the > maintainer, otherwise you would've CC'ed me. appearantly, you are subscribed to gentoo-dev. > > Greets, > Michael > On a sidenote, qmail has a huge amount of open bugs, and has generally gotten no love in the past time, so i wonder if it actually was/is maintained. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
