On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:02:00 +0200 Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:04:27PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: > > qmail-ldap will not be removed for sure, since i maintain it > > currently. > > Okay, my status there was outdated. We were at least discussing it at > some point in history. > > > > And as the netqmail ebuild maintainer, I want the ebuild to be as > > > simple as possible, that is, no external dependencies where > > > possible. > > > so, you suggest it is a better way to duplicate tons of code in 4 > > ebuilds? > > I'll think about it. > > [...] > > > On a sidenote, qmail has a huge amount of open bugs, and has > > generally gotten no love in the past time, so i wonder if it > > actually was/is maintained. > > qmail != netqmail. To my knowledge, we have only one outstanding bug > there, the one with man pages colliding, nothing critical. Since I > also have other things in life with higher priorities than Gentoo, it > has to wait. However, I should get to it during the week or at latest > two weeks. As it seems, you do not have the time and/or interest to cleanup the qmail mess, but don't want anyone to touch (net)qmail ebuilds either, i have put the updated ebuilds for qmail and friends into my overlay. [1] Maybe we can get them into the tree some time in the future. Bene [1] http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/hollow/2007/07/15/experimental_qmail_ebuilds -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
