Mike Frysinger wrote: > my point though wasnt to knock ati (although it was fun), the point was that > i > do not believe any closed source driver in our tree should ever be grounds > for preventing stabilization of a kernel ebuild > > so next time dsd (or whoever the ninja kernel maintainer happens to be at the > time) says "hey i plan on stabilizing Linux x.y.z" and someone goes "wait, > you cant until we get <closed source driver package foo> working", the reply > is of course "blow it out your arse^H^H^H^Htalk to the package maintainer, > this will not hold up stabilization efforts"
If we're gonna go with this policy here, I'm also going to adopt it for X so we don't get stuck in limbo as happened fairly recently. Thanks, Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
