On Saturday 22 of December 2007 18:56:12 Daniel Drake wrote: > Why (in terms of your GLEP) are you still allowing ebuilds to set EAPI > inside the ebuild? > > It seems that one approach you might take is to move the EAPI selection > into the filename and remove it from the ebuild itself, and it's not > clear to me why your proposal isn't exactly that.
That's the goal, yes. The "Specification" part shows how to do that in a backward compatible way and the "Application" part says how is the new format supposed to be used. But seeing it's not clear enough I will look into it. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
