2008-07-27 00:00:55 Carsten Lohrke napisał(a): > On Samstag, 26. Juli 2008, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > > Um, this already is the policy. We've always fixed bug reports about > > > LDFLAGS being ignored. > > > > Mark Loeser (Halcy0n) (QA project leader) said on 2008-07-24 that this > > policy doesn't exist. I understand that bug reports about LDFLAGS being > > ignored are usually fixed, so I ask for the formal enacting of this policy. > > Afaik it has always been the way that *sane* LDFLAGS are to be respected, but > exceptions exist of course and it's up to the maintainer to mangle or clear > your LDFLAGS, if deemed necessary. I'd like to know, why Mark asked to bring > this question up here. Shouldn't this be common sense!?
+1. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
