On 15:27 Fri 17 Apr , Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 15:17 Fri 17 Apr , Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote > > on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev > > list to see. > > I've got a few items pending that I would like to propose. It should be > clear that there are way too many topics in this list for a single > meeting, so we'll have to prioritize a bit and discuss on list in > advance as much as possible. > > Feel free to reply to this email regarding any of the below items. > Please change the subject so it's easier to parse through the > subthreads.
Here is an updated agenda. I've removed a few items that I consider lower priority and unlikely for us to have time for during this week's meeting. Also, I added the issue about USE=static-libs because I think it's important. -- Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com
Last meeting: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20090409-summary.txt EAPI=3: Provisional approval ---------------------------- Here are all features I saw that received a "no" on-list. Answers of "no" and "query" are starred. Only CONTROLLABLE-COMPRESS got both "no" and "critical" votes. > * CONTROLLABLE-COMPRESS betelgeuse: critical cardoe: critical dberkholz: critical *dev-zero: no leio: yes > * ANY-USE betelgeuse: yes cardoe: yes dberkholz: yes dev-zero: yes *leio: no > * DOEXAMPLE > * DOINCLUDE betelgeuse: yes cardoe: yes *dberkholz: no dev-zero: whatever doexample; yes doinclude *leio: no > * BANNED-COMMANDS betelgeuse: yes cardoe: yes dberkholz: whatever dev-zero: yes *leio: no for dohard > * UNPACK-IF-COMPRESSED betelgeuse: yes cardoe: yes *dberkholz: no dev-zero: yes *leio: query (for same reason as dberkholz, plain files) Goals: Any unanswered queries? Figure out what to do with features receiving a "no." Vote on approval of the spec once questionable features are resolved. Get progress update in portage from zmedico. GLEP 54: Dealing with live SCM packages --------------------------------------- Goal: Are we prepared to vote? If so, vote on approval of GLEP 54. Handling EAPI versioning in a forwards-compatible way ----------------------------------------------------- Goal: Are we prepared to vote? If so, vote on the implementation for the problem solved in GLEP 55. [dberkholz: I'm not prepared] Handling static libraries more flexibly --------------------------------------- Goal: Vote on whether to move forward with USE=static-libs to control building of static libraries.
pgpMreb5yDLmw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
