On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 23:21 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > Goals: Any unanswered queries? Figure out what to do with features > receiving a "no."
I think the whole council should understand why something received a "no" from someone, as they might be important technical (or subjective) arguments against having that in EAPI-3, as to be able to make an informed decision that is best for the whole of Gentoo. I believe we have up to now just given individual stances on the features - voting based on that doesn't really work right. It is quite likely that almost all features will get a majority "yes" vote when taken individually because not all council members have seen the problems a few of the council members have. So my point is that the whole of the council should consider the objections of an individual council member, so that potentially bad things don't end up accepted based on some kind of an uninformed majority vote or concensus. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [email protected] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
