-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 12:15 Thu 23 Apr , Tiziano Müller wrote: >> Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2009, 23:21 -0700 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: >>> Here is an updated agenda. I've removed a few items that I consider >>> lower priority and unlikely for us to have time for during this >>> week's meeting. Also, I added the issue about USE=static-libs >>> because I think it's important. >> I'd really like to see the topic about "portage changing behaviour" >> being discussed since I see it as crucial for future eapi/portage/pm >> development and I therefore consider it urgent as well. Furthermore it >> has been deferred already once. > > Which other important topic should we drop for it? I'm thinking we > probably won't even get to the last one, that's almost a wish list. I > think there's a pretty reasonable chance we also wouldn't get to > whatever other items came after this one. > > Zac, have you commented on this topic previously? How do you think it > should work? See "Portage changing behavior in ebuild-visible ways" at > http://dev.gentoo.org/~dberkholz/20090514-agenda.txt for a description. > CC'ing you to make sure you see this...
In the cases mentioned, I think that more communication would have helped, and I wasn't as careful as I should have been. In the future, I want to strive to use more communication to avoid problems like these. - -- Thanks, Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknwp8EACgkQ/ejvha5XGaME8QCg3O1fMWlN87aH8xyfqy6mZK8+ KxkAoMP7SJKdhZSJ7H8nq47HnmKUXjOF =4e2L -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
