On 12:15 Thu 23 Apr , Tiziano Müller wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2009, 23:21 -0700 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > > Here is an updated agenda. I've removed a few items that I consider > > lower priority and unlikely for us to have time for during this > > week's meeting. Also, I added the issue about USE=static-libs > > because I think it's important. > > I'd really like to see the topic about "portage changing behaviour" > being discussed since I see it as crucial for future eapi/portage/pm > development and I therefore consider it urgent as well. Furthermore it > has been deferred already once.
Which other important topic should we drop for it? I'm thinking we probably won't even get to the last one, that's almost a wish list. I think there's a pretty reasonable chance we also wouldn't get to whatever other items came after this one. Zac, have you commented on this topic previously? How do you think it should work? See "Portage changing behavior in ebuild-visible ways" at http://dev.gentoo.org/~dberkholz/20090514-agenda.txt for a description. CC'ing you to make sure you see this... -- Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com
pgpS1YXoNjfGz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
