On 04/04/2010 12:35 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 12:50 +0300, Petteri Räty a écrit : >> I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just >> means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a >> different resolution should be used. So what do you think about >> disabling later? > > You are trying to remove a valid status for a case that has been badly > managed ??? Speaking for gnome herd, afaik, all bugs marked LATER are > for the simple reason they will be done later and no other status would > be fine expect REJECTED maybe, but we don't want to say that to the face > of the reported like this do we ? >
And why not just keep them open as suggested? Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
