Alec Warner <anta...@gentoo.org> said:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 08:19:45PM +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera 
> > (klondike) wrote:
> >> El 16/05/11 19:54, Kacper Kowalik escribió:
> >> > Neither of those points include sending mail to gentoo-dev, which tend
> >> > to quickly convert into the "witch hunt" and seldom lead to anything
> >> > conclusive.
> >> To some of us (i.e. me as a staffer and probably any wanna be developer
> >> following the list) it is a good way to learn from others' mistake
> >> before applying for full developership.
> >>
> >
> > This may be a bit of surprise to you but this is not an educational
> > list. If you people disagree with these kind of commits feel free to
> > open a bug to QA/Devrel like the policy suggests. But pretty please
> > try to break this non-sense loop of this and similar threads.
> 
> I actually value times when this stuff is CC'd to the list, is there
> some other list you think folks should CC problems on?

This is exactly where these sorts of emails should go so every other
developer can see what's going on and ensure they are also following
current policies.

Don't make yet another list...that's just pointless.

-- 
Mark Loeser
email         -   halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
email         -   mark AT halcy0n DOT com
web           -   http://www.halcy0n.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to