On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:45:14PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 08:19:45PM +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera > > (klondike) wrote: > >> El 16/05/11 19:54, Kacper Kowalik escribió: > >> > Neither of those points include sending mail to gentoo-dev, which tend > >> > to quickly convert into the "witch hunt" and seldom lead to anything > >> > conclusive. > >> To some of us (i.e. me as a staffer and probably any wanna be developer > >> following the list) it is a good way to learn from others' mistake > >> before applying for full developership. > >> > > > > This may be a bit of surprise to you but this is not an educational > > list. If you people disagree with these kind of commits feel free to > > open a bug to QA/Devrel like the policy suggests. But pretty please > > try to break this non-sense loop of this and similar threads. > > I actually value times when this stuff is CC'd to the list, is there > some other list you think folks should CC problems on? > > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 > > > This problem is not a technical one to justify discussion on gentoo-dev list. This is clearly a disagreement over the established policies which should go through QA and/or Devrel if someone feels like it worths pushing it so far.
Regards, -- Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
pgpeAtYaBdY7I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
