On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 08:52:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2011 20:51:00 +0100 > Markos Chandras <[email protected]> wrote: > > This problem is not a technical one to justify discussion on > > gentoo-dev list. This is clearly a disagreement over the established > > policies which should go through QA and/or Devrel if someone feels > > like it worths pushing it so far. > > No, it's reminding a developer of what current policies are. And if one > developer has forgotten or hasn't seen recent changes, others are > probably in the same situation too, so a friendly reminder where > everyone can see it helps everyone. > > -- > Ciaran McCreesh Ciaran,
I would agree with you if this wasn't the second time we talk about this within a week. http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_64aa35ae3aff8e711fc280c238d8f44c.xml Regards, -- Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
pgpVrfkd5e8aJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
