On 03-01-2012 13:02:55 -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:50:25PM -0500, Olivier Crête wrote:
> > I don't see what breakage would be caused by a big-bang update (move
> > everything in /sbin,/bin/,usr/sbin to usr/bin and add symlinks. I really
> > doubt any system has a /usr so tight that adding the couple things that
> > are in / to /usr/bin would break it.. Btw, this also includes /lib*
> > to /usr/lib*.
>
> I think the best way to do this part of it is going to be to just follow
> the upstream packages. When they release a new version that installs in
> /usr, just allow that to happen. Eventually there will be very little in
> /{bin,sbin,lib}, maybe nothing besides a couple of symbolic links like
> /bin/sh.What packages would that be? If you're thinking about coreutils, just trim down the ebuild by not moving some of the tools to /bin. Our ebuild makes it conform to FHS, not the coreutils buildsystem itself. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
