On 16/02/2013 20:18, Alec Warner wrote: > So because we did things badly in the past, that is an excuse to do > things badly in the future? :)
No. I still argue that this is NOT doing things badly. Masking a package will NOT cause it to get unmerged by default. The whole line of thought that Rick is bringing here is based on the assumption that masked package == removed package, which is false, so the whole point is moot. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
