On Tue, 21 May 2013 18:57:20 -0600 Ryan Hill <dirtye...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Huh? The severity of the bug is it's an enhancement. > > Yes stabilizations are enhancements. Always have been. Why are they enhancements? Them having been this way is not a reason not to change the priority and severity fields to make more sense. > > Also, your script does not set the STABLEREQ keyword. People are > > having to hunt down your robo-stabilisation requests and add it > > themselves. You should just do it yourself or turn your script off. > > Did you read the message? The point is you're supposed to add that > yourself. It's not a STABLEREQ until you add arches. Yet the base system lead went and apply it to any stabilization bug; as both him and Jer (the bug wrangling lead) do it this way, I'll be doing it as well. Let's not be inconsistent with our leads unless there is a wide decision to do so; I expect none will come, unless you really think this should become Council material. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
