Hi all, I'm splitting the thread because this is a separate subject.
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 12:59:56AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > I do understand why Roy refer this as oldnet... but why in Gentoo do > we keep the term old? The functionality of these script is huge, and > is better than most distros out there. Do we want keep users out of > it? are we going to obsolete this huge work? If we don't I suggest to > remove the 'old' implication, to something like openrc-gentoo-net. Actually the plan is to generalize it so that it works with other init systems. Right now it is very tightly integrated with OpenRc, but there is interest in changing that, so adding openrc to the name would be misleading eventually. Also, at this point, renaming it would require renaming the repository on git.overlays.gentoo.org or fixing the ebuild. When Robin and I etalked about the split a while back this was the best name we could come up with unfortunately. William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
