On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Actually the plan is to generalize it so that it works with other init > > systems. Right now it is very tightly integrated with OpenRc, but there > > is interest in changing that, so adding openrc to the name would be > > misleading eventually. > > OK... so gentoo-networking? or just come up with own name? best-networking?
I don't know about "best-networking". ;-) One reason we are splitting it out also is so it can have its own development/release cycle; the oldnet stuff is responsible for about 1/3 of the bugs against OpenRc right now, and it is very difficult to test because of all of the possibilities. > However, I do not understand how you can port it without changing the > notations... or lowering features... example: rc_net_*_provide, > rc_net_*_need, or the rc_config, rc_use, rc_net_*_provide="!net" > etc... > > Do you think systemd users can understand that /etc/conf.d/net is > actually a shell script? I hope this is not going to be eliminated, as > I use it a lot. Robin is going to do most of it I think; I'm not exactly sure what he has in mind. William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
