On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> OK... so gentoo-networking? or just come up with own name? best-networking? > > > You and I have had this talk more times than I can remember at this > point. Using the name "oldnet" sucks and was one of the worst choices > possible. Looking through our IRC chats, I had also suggested > gentoo-networking. How about gen-net? It's nice, short and the name is more flexible if the pkg is picked up by other distros (something bantied about during previous discussions). > If we lose that flexibility and configurability then just give up on > OpenRC right now cause its dead because all interesting features are > gone and it'll just become an inferior init system that needs to be > replaced. > ++ -- Brian Dolbec <dol...@gentoo.org>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
