-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/04/2013 04:37 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > I thought about gentoo-networking, but that sucks in a way too > because it implies that everyone on gentoo should be using it. > > ... > >> How about gen-net? It's nice, short and the name is more >> flexible if the pkg is picked up by other distros (something >> bantied about during previous discussions). > > Hmm, that is a little too cryptic maybe... Is gen "Gentoo? > General? Generic?" >
Since it was pulled out of openrc, the name "netrc" also suggests itself. > As I have said before, none of this is an attempt to kill or > deprecate anything. It is just re-arranging things by moving the > old gentoo network stack into its own package. There are no plans > to stop you from using it if you want to use it. There is > definitely nothing being said here about the state of OpenRc in > general. I admit when I first saw the name a few weeks ago I thought "oh shit they're going to make me redo all of my network configs." Google cleared it up, but still. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJR/s9EAAoJEBxJck0inpOiCqIP/0b5+yJgrEsk3jLsaceiypdF 94fj1Kq+tFMSctI6Jw8N/2gECTuk8pcTZHLWR++9Co4I37OpxZ4IKAiI7gaznU4e aPNVKd24dXy5ajnnSjTlD0m/S1ppMPZk8g4vmK3beod10KVdNCSuEEMNMq4c5pO7 uBWb8kww8YrCU1VaoGo90YHD+LY+hTaBgQDa5hr/TEZforRc5KP3BuMZCB3ONAwm Nw+uOiCB8dM+B54qmAfx+AsBNbPRrDGZzFIat0eCAiTix6scGY6m5/h7j7ZkNRoK YkMRCDfS1z/UQgHw9YOdLqr3TyM8Lq7jmqiEL+mb+iM4JNHKCtNo2q3JXHIT/1Wi qF1vD4TjC8Qom6Fyxm6InyKREqt4GVFw2eUS+V7+SxumgPsqGZ9Utx5SGVL2/+4h qwc+xp9tD5OJ02dK6eCWF+Q3sS1RdgprZu0h05rmMw6vGNZ7AokbOymyuo5Xoxu1 M+PlFHTrg8ETjetI+dRe3FQ5nTLdqmUw0mPqcbtPfEe5KzVbyJHlz2L7PTYGhtug tapJz1RjrPBwDJRtn/JIULvbUQHKg1sZwOv6K0FmJzLchticAUfaF7Puk6MOQvno yufIpNHjt/IfGyYNlELSmuWPHaAbGBCR/IbW1hwnFBf+NRXS1SIpjye8Fx2Y/cxh wK1JnALTBINNyvwoCfJj =M2rV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
