Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> But, OK, so I will use your strawman to prove >> how static deps are broken: > > This is not broken. This is exactly what is supposed to happen
"It's not a bug it's a feature" Of course, one can always close the eyes when faced with problems. > and it > is exactly what *does* happen some of the time with dynamic > dependencies too. Yes, both concepts have problems. Since neither solution is perfect, why choose the one with unnecessary rebuilds?
