Martin Vaeth: > Ciaran McCreesh <[email protected]> wrote: >>> But, OK, so I will use your strawman to prove >>> how static deps are broken: >> >> This is not broken. This is exactly what is supposed to happen > > "It's not a bug it's a feature" > Of course, one can always close the eyes when faced > with problems. > >> and it >> is exactly what *does* happen some of the time with dynamic >> dependencies too. > > Yes, both concepts have problems. > Since neither solution is perfect, why choose the one > with unnecessary rebuilds? > >
You are not contributing anything useful to the thread currently. Read the whole thread. Read up on dynamic deps. Read up on PMS.
