On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Martin Vaeth <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, both concepts have problems.
The problems are of a different kind. Static dependencies don't do something that you want them to do. Dynamic dependencies are outright broken. > Since neither solution is perfect, why choose the one > with unnecessary rebuilds? We are picking the *correct* solution, not the one that sometimes hides an occasional inconvenience (but unreliably) at the expense of being utterly broken. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
