-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 12/07/2014 07:45 PM, Tim Harder wrote:
> On 2014-12-07 13:15, Martin Vaeth wrote:
>> The most important consumer is app-text/pdftk Unfortunately,
>> there is still no replacement for the latter which works as
>> good, especially if you have tricky pdfs to process. Loosing gcj
>> would therefore be a real loss.
> 
> As long as you're fine with any command-line pdf processing tool, 
> you could use app-text/cpdf which I've used for a long time and
> just added to the tree.
> 
> Note that it's licensed under a non-commercial type license
> though.

Why would we want to replace a working GPL-2 application for an
application under a non-free license? As one of the users of
app-text/pdftk I'm not a big supporter of this (although I have not
looked into mcpdf as was brought up earlier in this thread, although
that as well seems to be under a more restrictive AGPL-3 license).


- -- 
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=t1ZM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to