On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Kristian Fiskers > > By all means, thanks for informing about an alternative, but I > personally believe that it is important for the overall distribution > to keep a wider perspective than personal non-free use (even if this > is a developers primary focus as reason for contribution), otherwise > we'll hit a wall quickly enough. > > In this specific case I at least use pdftk for some batch jobs on > business-related servers and a non-commercial license would not be > viable.
pdfTK is also GPLv2, (effectively GPLv3 since iText is /A/GPLv/3/? Effectively AGPLv3 when in a public-facing service?) unless you're paying for it. I doubt m-click would refuse to consider alternative paid licensing if they were asked.
