On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:33:04 +1200 Kent Fredric <ken...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 19:28:48 +0200 > "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > C. Mask chromium's system-ffmpeg flag when the dependency on > > ffmpeg-3.0.1 can't be satisfied > > I'd pick this option, mostly because this is the path that introduces > the least amount of space for breaking users setups. You seem to forget the burden and the bugs this introduces by itself. A quick glance at bugzie gave me: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562600 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=513048 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507080 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=506268 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493670 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491850 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491582 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491466 Most are fixed, but for me this implies that the space for breaking users setup is much wider with bundled ffmpeg...
