On 17/10/16 14:44, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
>> If a binary package is provided in addition to its source-based
>> equivalent, the name of the former should be suffixed with '-bin'
>> for distinction."
> Essentially what I would like to see in policy yes. Though it does not 
> address 
> the problem of identifying packages that can be built from source, that get 
> put in tree as binary, for what ever reason.
Perhaps you can compile a list of such packages, as I would imagine QA
would be interested as to how 'widespread' this problem really is?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to