On 17/10/16 14:44, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: >> If a binary package is provided in addition to its source-based >> equivalent, the name of the former should be suffixed with '-bin' >> for distinction." > Essentially what I would like to see in policy yes. Though it does not > address > the problem of identifying packages that can be built from source, that get > put in tree as binary, for what ever reason. > Perhaps you can compile a list of such packages, as I would imagine QA would be interested as to how 'widespread' this problem really is?
Description: OpenPGP digital signature