> Therefore, we may indeed consider taking the DCO from the Linux source > tree which is distributed under the GPL-2
I highly doubt that the DCO in the readme is licensed under GPL-2. There is no readme/header, or other indicator stating this. Not everything in the linux repository falls under GPL-2. Thus, we simply blatantly violate the distribution terms: »Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.« Best, Matthias
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
