>>>>> On Tue, 30 May 2017, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Tue, 30 May 2017 00:01:16 +0200 > Ulrich Mueller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Also, can we find a better name? Sorry for the bikeshedding at this >> early stage, but I believe that ENFORCED_USE can be easily confused >> with use.force in profiles. MAPPED_USE? USE_MAP? > Why do we even need a new name ? This was under the assumption that we would somewhat restrict the syntax. Sure, if someone comes up with an algorithm that will give a unique and predictable solution with current REQUIRED_USE syntax then we can keep the old name. Ulrich
pgpkcDvb1xl6v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
