On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 02:26:41PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > On Saturday 12 November 2005 08:14, Brian Harring wrote: > > Might be worth noting that as of my last sync, .53* and friends are > > *still* ~arch. > > Yep, waiting on approval from the arch teams before going stable. I'll be > posting a notification here when it happens as well. While waiting on the > arch teams has extended the ~arch time of .53_preX, they've also exposed > regressions that wouldn't have been picked up otherwise. Other than > documentation concerns, they seem happy with .53 as it stands and I really > don't want to jeopardize (that's a weird lookin' word) that. > > How's this for a compromise? Release the current 2.0.53 into stable so that > 2.0.51.22-r3 can be dropped out of the picture altogether. Then release a > 2.0.53.1 into ~arch with the lib handling fix so that we can get some > guaranteed testing time of the patch. In a table: > > 2.0.53 arch > 2.0.53_p1 ~arch > 2.0.54_pre1 package.mask > > After a couple of weeks, move 2.0.53_p1 to stable and drop 2.0.53. No major complaints on general idea, dependant on timeframe (outside of our control).
*cough* that's that funky _p1 you're using there? :) ~harring
pgpmdPVaXL3uK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
