On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 08:52:13PM -0600, Brian Harring wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 09:19:55AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > On Sunday 13 November 2005 04:00, Brian Harring wrote: > > > *cough* that's that funky _p1 you're using there? :) > > > > patchlevel... I think it gives a stronger impression that 2.0.53 is > > distinct > > from 2.0.54. Is distinct the right word? I mean that it kind of shows that > > 2.0.53 is done but there was something that needed to be fixed quickly. > > 2.0.53.1 vs 2.0.53_p1 vs 2.0.53.p1 ... either of the three indicates > 2.0.53 had minor fix tagged onto the base 2.0.53 release...
i prefer 2.0.53.1 myself -mike -- [email protected] mailing list
