On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:52:13 -0600 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 09:19:55AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > On Sunday 13 November 2005 04:00, Brian Harring wrote: > > > *cough* that's that funky _p1 you're using there? :) > > > > patchlevel... I think it gives a stronger impression that 2.0.53 is > > distinct from 2.0.54. Is distinct the right word? I mean that it > > kind of shows that 2.0.53 is done but there was something that > > needed to be fixed quickly. > > 2.0.53.1 vs 2.0.53_p1 vs 2.0.53.p1 ... either of the three indicates > 2.0.53 had minor fix tagged onto the base 2.0.53 release... Except that the third one isn't valid syntax. Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. -- [email protected] mailing list
