On 09:51 Sun 19 Aug , Adam Piątyszek wrote: > * Donnie Berkholz [2007-08-19 05:27]: > > Yeah, a good approach would use something like blas-config to get > > include paths. Do we need an fft-config? > > Maybe... But, the other problem is that these FFT implementations that > IT++ can use (FFTW, MKL, ACML) have completely different interfaces. So > it is not the same situation as for various BLAS and LAPACK > implementation...
Right. You'd need to decide which implementations to allow on a per-ebuild basis, depending on how you called fft-config. Thanks, Donnie -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
