on 08/05/2011 08:44 AM Mick wrote the following: > On Friday 05 Aug 2011 06:14:37 Adam Carter wrote: >> The noscript firefox addon gives significant protection with only a >> little inconvenience. > > By "little inconvenience" you mean that most webpages will not show up > properly? These days any page has a tonne of JavaScript in it and menus, > slideshows, etc. will not render without it. Because many designers or CMS' > engines do not provide graceful degradation, you end up looking at half a > page > and thinking what else is missing. > > I agree that security can have a price in terms of inconvenience, but I found > that I had to switch NoScript off after a while because it was becoming a > significant hindrance. >
I will agree. I also have it almost "switched off" (allow scripts globally).
