On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:41:28AM -0500, Mike Edenfield wrote: > Actually, it's just the words "purple RAIN" with e/a/I replaced with 3/4/1; > I chose l33t-sp33k since I figured it was so over-used for password > generation that everyone would recognize it immediately :) But yes, I think > Randall's point is much the same as yours: once the cracker tools "figure > out" this pattern of character replacements it becomes significantly less > secure. I'm just curious if there are any real metrics as to "how much less > secure" that is...
I'm mixing both -- having long phrases (like whole, but normal, sentences), or randomly joined words, and those words are in turn leetified. Exampple: r3dc7053tch41r (red, closet and chair combined in such a fashion). -- Gruß | Greetings | Qapla' I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services. Düsseldorf is only half as big as the graveyard of New York, but twice as dead.
pgp4qgoXr279K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
