On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> wrote:
> On 2013-08-19 9:36 AM, William Kenworthy <bi...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>>
>> I rather suspect that they are going after the cloud/VM market ...
>> having VM's boot quickly and simply along with no desire/need to fault
>> find and repair ... just rm it and spin up another instance.
>
>
> Nothing to 'suspect'... they have made it very clear that that is precisely
> where this (systemd) is coming from.
>
>
>> It makes sense in that market ... what doesn't is pushing it into areas
>> that are not appropriate and people dont want it.
>
>
> Exactly, and exactly.
>
>
>> I still have not seen an adequate explanation as to why systemd isn't a
>> profile as its far more intrusive than a gnome/kde choice and they have
>> profiles.  That way some bad choices like polluting systems with systemd
>> files because they are only small and insignificant might be avoided.  I
>> have used the mask method but did waste some time on chasing down odd
>> errors due to missing file errors in the logs so I would rather not have
>> them on the system at all.
>>
>> So why not a profile so those guys who want to play can get a
>> configuration that better suits them?
>
>
> I have to say that makes the most sense to me...
>
> Would love to hear *rational* comments from the systemd purveyors as to why
> this shouldn't be done.

Yohan already say it: you would need to do several combinations
(systemd+GNOME, systemd+KDE, systemd+SELinux, etc.)

Your "polluted" files are nothing (3MB, including binaries in a
*systemd* installation... if you don't use systemd they should take
less than 512KB); you don't want the profile "solution" for technical
reasons, you want it for political reasons.

That is not going to happen, and the (majority of) Gentoo maintainers
(including the council) already stated that, if you don't want systemd
unit files "polluting" your system, please use INSTALL_MASK.

Regards.
-- 
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Reply via email to