On 19/08/2013 18:39, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2013-08-19 9:36 AM, Alan McKinnon <[email protected]> wrote: >> For me, I'm not opposed to merging /usr. I'm not opposed to other people >> using systemd, I am opposed to*me* using it. > > Agreed, and that is precisely the concern here... > >> For your other question, you don't need an initramfs if your /usr is not >> split off and drivers for your fs on / and chipset are compiled in. That >> will stay true for ages to come (until some joker starts shipping kernel >> drivers in /var....) > > Right, but that wasn't my question, my question was will I be able to > continue using eudev (or mdev, or whatever)... >
Surely that depends on how well-maintained eudev remains in the future? And is therefore best answered by the package maintainers? Like I said a little earlier, I really think your best bet is a udev fork (even if it's eudev) maintained with the same effort input as udev was before all this stuff started coming down the pipes. what I do know is that eudev is already lagging behind udev, most likely a symptom of limited time available from the maintainer. -- Alan McKinnon [email protected]
