Hello,
On Fri, 07 Dec 2018, Dale wrote:
>David Haller wrote:
>> On Fri, 07 Dec 2018, Dale wrote:
>>> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>>> Have you tried gkrellm? It's very neat. Sits in a vertical strip at
>>>> the side of your screen and shows a whole load of things all at
>>>> once. I've been using it for donkeys' years.
>>> That's what I generally use. I don't see a place for it to show the CPU
>>> frequency tho. Did I miss it?
>> Nope. Try your local x11-plugins/gkrellm-gkfreq, see attachment ;)
>
>Oh man. They added a lot of plugins since I last looked. I couldn't
>find the one you mentioned but I did find gkrellm-cpupower which seems
>to be it. Maybe they changed a name recently???
Nah, cpupower seems to be even older that gkfreq, but that is also at
least from 2010 ;) IIRC I found it linked from the gkrellm homepage.
>Thing about that, it takes up way to much room to display. I could
>check it on occasion but I wouldn't want to leave it up there all the
>time.
You can configure it! But cpupower seems to take at least a
line/CPU-Core. BTW it seems you have to restart gkrellm to have
cpupower update it's config, unlike most other plugins (e.g. gkfreq ;)
>Thanks for the tip tho. I'm going to check into the other plugins that
>might be nifty to have.
gkfreq can be configured that it just shows one line (e.g. "Max",
which is how I have it), and which suits me. Oh and with that slower
update-rate in my other follow-up with the patch.
Check both out. You can use both cpupower and gkfreq for testing and
keep whichever you like better ;)
-dnh
--
[David hat Thomas einen Geologen genannt]
>Ich bastle auch schon an der Bombe fuer David.... :-))
*JAUL* *duck* *fluecht* *eingrab* *Ach nee, das bringt bei nem
Geo_PHYSIKER_ ja nix* *Heul* *UFO kaper*
[Thomas Hertweck und Haller in suse-talk]
