Laurence Perkins wrote: > On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 16:54 -0600, Dale wrote: >> Howdy, >> >> As some know, I've accumulated a lot of videos. I googled around and >> found some software but not sure based on what they claim if they >> will >> do something I'm looking for. I installed a couple but not real big >> on >> how they work. One requires me to add videos, one at a time. I have >> over 20,000 videos now. Some are short youtube type videos, some are >> long videos. It could take me years to add them all doing it one at >> a >> time. Needless to say, that one didn't last long. The biggest thing >> I'm looking for, software that can tell me what videos have a low >> resolution. As a example, some videos I downloaded a long time ago >> have >> been updated to have higher resolutions. I may have one that is a >> 360P, >> or even less, but I may can locate a new version that is HD or even >> very >> HD. I'd like software that will tell me this sort of info as well as >> other nifty features as well. Obviously, I'd like to start with the >> lower resolution videos first. >> >> So far, I have installed Griffith and GCStar. I been googling for >> others but some either are not in the tree or I already know they >> won't >> do one thing I'd like to see. I'd also like to be able to point it >> to a >> directory and let it build the database on its own. Adding them one >> at >> a time manually just isn't feasible at all. >> >> Does anyone know of a software package that will sort a lot of videos >> by >> resolution as well as track other things as well? It could be that >> what >> I'd like to have doesn't exist at all. Then again, maybe I just >> haven't >> found it yet. ;-) >> >> Thanks. >> >> Dale >> >> :-) :-) >> > Digikam might be worth a try. It does some pretty advanced stuff with > photos and I think at this point it can do quite a bit of the sorting > and searching stuff with videos as well. I've not tried it with videos > myself though so I can't make any promises. > > LMP > >
I have and use that for pictures. Maybe it is something recently added that I missed. I'll look into that some more. Since I already use it, it would be nice. I just use it to track what is downloaded and what is not so I use it as a basic tool. I used to use gtkam, I think that is the name. It got a bug of some sort so I switched to digikam several years ago. Thanks. Dale :-) :-)
