On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:58:03AM +0100, Penguin Lover Henry Gebhardt squawked:
> > So, yes, pwdb is a runtime dependency. I don't actually run pam, so can't
> > confirm what would happen if I remove pwdb.
> >
>
> Holy shit, what's going on? The ebuild in the portage tree is different than
> the one in /var/db/pkg/. Is it normal to update an ebuild but not its
> revision number? Here is the diff:
>
---snipped---
Damn, I spoke too soon. Just re-synced, and now this pops in the
Changelog for pam
10 Feb 2008; Diego Petten<C3><B2> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pam-0.99.8.1-r1.ebuild,
pam-0.99.9.0.ebuild:
Remove dependency over pwdb, pam_pwdb is no more present in PAM 0.99, so
the dependency was bogus.
So, yeah, pwdb is not a dependency anymore and people can safely
remove it.
W
--
Somehow I feel like I needed the attention
~Poly Chan. After his noodle and beef stir-fry stirred the fire
alarm and caused two fire engines and one ambulance to gather
outside our dorm door. 06-09-2002
Sortir en Pantoufles: up 433 days, 2:43
--
[email protected] mailing list
