Hi Willie, Thursday, February 14, 2008, 6:19:41 AM, you wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 01:17:35AM +0200, Penguin Lover Alan McKinnon > squawked: >> emerge -n pwdb > Actually, don't do that. Alan gave the right answer, but it seems that > my portage tree was just a few days out of date. flameeyes just > removed the dependency for pwdb from pam. (See my other reply for the > message. I see. > So this might actually explain why depclean and equery depends gave > you different answers: one was reading the new entry for pam in the > tree, and one was reading the old entry for (the same version... why > didn't they bump the version?) pam in /var/db. And since the version > was not bumped, your emerge --update world or whatever did not think > to rebuild pam (and copy the new ebuild to /var/db).... IMHO it's fully incorrect. Minor version must be changed at least... > A weird incident at that. > Best wishes, > W > -- > One man's vacuum is another man's sewer. > ~N. Milleron > Sortir en Pantoufles: up 433 days, 2:45 -- Sergey -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
