Hi Willie, Thursday, February 14, 2008, 6:14:44 AM, you wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:58:03AM +0100, Penguin Lover Henry Gebhardt > squawked: >> > So, yes, pwdb is a runtime dependency. I don't actually run pam, so can't >> > confirm what would happen if I remove pwdb. >> > >> >> Holy shit, what's going on? The ebuild in the portage tree is different than >> the one in /var/db/pkg/. Is it normal to update an ebuild but not its >> revision number? Here is the diff: >> > ---snipped--- > Damn, I spoke too soon. Just re-synced, and now this pops in the > Changelog for pam > 10 Feb 2008; Diego Petten<C3><B2> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > pam-0.99.8.1-r1.ebuild, pam-0.99.9.0.ebuild: > Remove dependency over pwdb, pam_pwdb is no more present in > PAM 0.99, so the dependency was bogus. Where did you find it? Native pam Changelog or other location? > So, yeah, pwdb is not a dependency anymore and people can safely > remove it. > W > -- > Somehow I feel like I needed the attention > ~Poly Chan. After his noodle and beef stir-fry stirred the fire > alarm and caused two fire engines and one ambulance to gather > outside our dorm door. 06-09-2002 > Sortir en Pantoufles: up 433 days, 2:43 -- Sergey -- [email protected] mailing list
