Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > You are publishing the cdrtools package. The cdrtools package "in whole
> > or in part contains" mkisofs.c. So, "you must cause" the cdrtools
> > package "to be licensed as a whole" under the terms of the GNU GPL,
> > right?
>
> So, in other words, mkisofs cannot be included in an package that
> is not GPL'ed, right ?
>
> Wouldn't it solve the problem to just move out mkisofs to it's own
> package ?
The main problem would be solved if Daniel Iliev did inform himself correctly
what's done in cdrtools and did not post ridiculous claims.
I cannot comment claims that have no relation at all to the reality in cdrtools.
If he continues to post this kind of claims, I need to ignore him. In order to
discuss licensing of cdrtools, some basic knowledge about facts is needed. It
does not help to write claims that do not apply to cdrtools as he did.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
