Hartmut Figge wrote:
> Dale:
>
>   
>> A few days ago, I did rename .mozilla to .mozilla.old and it worked
>> fine.  Then I copied over my emails, password files and bookmarks.
>>     
>
> You should really test with a new profile as described. That is the
> standard way to test the integrity of a profile.
>
> No crash in the testprofile and you know, that something is wrong in the
> old one. And if the testprofile crashes you can go back to the old
> profile and have nothing lost but some minutes.
>
>   

This is what I did the other day when I renamed .mozilla to
.mozilla.old.  Seamonkey did NOT crash when I did that.  It also didn't
after I transfered my emails and didn't for a little bit after I
transfered the password files. 

>> I did notice that when I pointed the prefs.js file to the correct
>> password file, it started messing up shortly after that.
>>     
>
> Sounds like the prefs.js is corrupt after editing. Which editor did you
> use? And surely SM was closed while editing, hm? ;)
>   

Actually, I used about:config to edit it.  I did restart Seamonkey tho
it shouldn't be necessary.  My old passwords did show up then tho. 
Again, that site worked the first couple times.

>   
>> Keep in mind that all I did is correct the name of the password file.
>>     
>
> That could be done.
>
>   
>> I guess it could be that something is messed up with the password
>> file.
>>     
>
> And i guess that something went wrong with editing the prefs.js. *g*
>   

This is the line that i changed:

wallet.SchemaValueFileName

And I changed it to:

60988542.s

Which is the name of the file that contains my password info.  Is there
a way to "export" then import my password info?  I can't find one other
than the way I did it.

>   
>>> Create a new profile with Tools->Switch Profile->Manage Profiles...,
>>> switch to it and do nothing else than calling http://wireless.att.com/
>>> in the browser.
>>>       
>
> Do so!
>
> [ seamonkey-1.1.16.en-US.linux-i686.tar.gz from mozilla.org ]
>   
>> I would hate to have to install it locally that way.  I sort of let
>> portage handle all that.  I mess up enough already with portage helping
>> me.  lol
>>     
>
> I doubt i will be necessary after using a testprofile.
>
> And there is no danger in unpacking and running SM locally. It will not
> interfere with gentoo and can be safely removed after testing without
> leaving traces.
>
> But probably not necessary. Did i mention already that you should use a
> testprofile?
>   

I have done that on windoze before.  It does work.  I just pulled out
enough hair this week.  o_O

>   
>> I have ran Seamonkey as root before but never used sudo.
>>     
>
> Than there is no danger. Running as root is okay.
>
> Hartmut
>
>   

Cool.  I got to have my adblock.  I'm on dial-up and I try to save all
the downloading I can.

Dale

:-)  :-)

Reply via email to