On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Mike MacCracken <[email protected]>wrote:
> Manu--Given that the observed preindustrial global baseline is not all > that well known, 2 F above present (of course, one has to worry how that is > precisely defined as well > Exactly and I don't think you can define it easily -- it has to be set in a certain year. The "present" can't ever be a baseline as it's not a constant. "2F above present" would be meaningless a few years down the line when the "present" has moved further. Manu --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
