Greg, cc list:

        1.   Thanks for alerting us on 1 July to the cloudiness-CDR-related 
message found at the Russ George website  
(http://russgeorge.net/2017/07/01/greatest-uncertainty-in-climate-change-models-is-diminishing-cloudiness/
 
<http://russgeorge.net/2017/07/01/greatest-uncertainty-in-climate-change-models-is-diminishing-cloudiness/>
  ).   I hope others can chime in on the validity of the strong relationship 
George asserts between phytoplankton and clouds.  Is this as important as the 
much discussed SRM option involving ships spraying salt particles to help form 
clouds?

        2.  Your brief cite from Russ George refers to “a new paper” - which 
(free and 9 pages) can be found at 
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2017EF000601/epdf 
<http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2017EF000601/epdf>, entitled:  
   “Could geoengineering research help answer one of the biggest questions in 
climate science?”
        with first author Robert Wood.  The “biggest question” is of course 
related to cloud formation as stated in your quote below from Russ George.  
        
        3.  I was amazed at the many messages at the George site that relate to 
geoengineering and this cloud topic  (and NOT to Russ George’s fame with  OIF = 
Ocean Iron Fertilization).   Examples of cites that I found relating to this 
cloud-plankton topic:
        
a.   
https://www.atmos.washington.edu/~robwood/papers/geoengineering/Wood_Ackerman_CLIMATICCHANGE_2013.pdf
 
<https://www.atmos.washington.edu/~robwood/papers/geoengineering/Wood_Ackerman_CLIMATICCHANGE_2013.pdf>
   (A predecessor to the above “biggest question” paper.

b.   
https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/60/9/722/238034/Microalgae-The-Potential-for-Carbon-Capture
 
<https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/60/9/722/238034/Microalgae-The-Potential-for-Carbon-Capture>
   A 2010 article by Sayre (recommended by Russ George):  

c.  https://www.thenakedscientists.com/articles/features/clouds-plankton 
<https://www.thenakedscientists.com/articles/features/clouds-plankton>  a short 
free 2014 more non-technical contribution on the sulfur aspects.

d.    James Lovelock in a later book ‘The Revenge of Gaia’ in 2006, refers to 
his Anti-CLAW Hypothesis.  CLAW comes from four last names - with L for 
Lovelock.     This shows that this is not a new topic.  I hope some on the list 
with a real background (I have none) can give other opinions on how seriously 
we should take Mr.  George’s views on plankton-clouds-climate (as opposed to 
plankton and increased salmon production).

        4.  I suspect there could be a biochar side to this cloud aspect of 
ocean biomass - and possibly even to phytoplankton.  I suspect you have 
probably given us this cite to agree with Ross George that the geo aspect 
deserves study.  I am not expecting you or anyone on this list to agree that 
this should promote biochar.  In fact, his emphasis on missing dust would say 
that biochar’s emphasis on increased “green-ness” is evidence that biochar 
should make less dust most likely.   But I can also argue that biochar from 
ocean biomass (placed on land, not in the ocean) could/might more than offset 
the “dust-free” negative aspect of land-based biochar.   Of course it opens the 
possibility of a much larger supply than available from the 28 % of the earth’s 
surface NOT ocean.

        5.   I also found the George message comparing the Sustainable 
Development Goals (SDGs)  #14 (oceans) and #15 (land) to be particularly 
disturbing from a combined CDR/SRM perspective.  Mr.  George is particularly 
upset about the UN system doing too little with #14 (oceans).   I believe you 
agree - and could be (?)  the reason for your message below.   This concern 
about SDG #14 (brand new to me) is on much more than this relationship between 
plankton and clouds - and could be worth considerable discussion by this list - 
as CDR might look more possible with a bigger supply. So this is a very 
separate reason for thanking you for your 1 July message below. I’ll send more 
on only this in the AM.

Ron


> On Jul 1, 2017, at 4:32 PM, Greg Rau <gh...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> 
> Greatest Uncertainty In Climate Change Models Is Diminishing Cloudiness - 
> Russ George 
> <http://russgeorge.net/2017/07/01/greatest-uncertainty-in-climate-change-models-is-diminishing-cloudiness/>
> 
> 
> Greatest Uncertainty In Climate Change Models Is Diminishing Cloudiness - R...
> Restoring ocean pastures and their cooling clouds in 10% of the area 
> available would offset the warming from a d...
>  
> <http://russgeorge.net/2017/07/01/greatest-uncertainty-in-climate-change-models-is-diminishing-cloudiness/>
> 
> 
> "Climate scientists propose in a new paper published 
> <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2017EF000601/epdf> in the widely 
> read open source science journal Earth’s Future that by restoring cloudiness 
> to selected areas of distant oceans a planetary cooling effect sufficient to 
> offset a doubling of greenhouse gas emissions could be achieved with as 
> little as a 10% increase in cloudiness over pristine open ocean pasture 
> regions.
> The authors note that climate model simulations indicate that regions of 
> extensive marine low clouds account for a large portion of the global aerosol 
> driven global cooling. They explain that while this may seem 
> counter-intuitive, marine clouds in these pristine areas are very susceptible 
> to small changes in aerosols."
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to