https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14693062.2022.2091509?s=03

The value of information about solar geoengineering and the two-sided cost
of bias
Anthony R. Harding,Mariia Belaia &David W. Keith

ABSTRACT

Solar geoengineering (SG) might be able to reduce climate risks if used to
supplement emissions cuts and carbon removal. Yet, the wisdom of proceeding
with research to reduce its uncertainties is disputed. Here, we use an
integrated assessment model to estimate that the value of information that
reduces uncertainty about SG efficacy. We find the value of reducing
uncertainty by one-third by 2030 is around $4.5 trillion, most of which
comes from reduced climate damages rather than reduced mitigation costs.
Reducing uncertainty about SG efficacy is similar in value to reducing
uncertainty about climate sensitivity. We analyse the cost of
over-confidence about SG that causes too little emissions cuts and too much
SG. Consistent with concerns about SG’s moral hazard problem, we find an
over-confident bias is a serious and costly concern; but, we also find
under-confidence that prematurely rules out SG can be roughly as costly.
Biased judgments are costly in both directions. A coin has two sides. Our
analysis quantitatively demonstrates the risk-risk trade-off around SG and
reinforces the value of research that can reduce uncertainty.

Key policy insights

The value of reducing uncertainty about solar geoengineering is comparable
to the value of reducing uncertainty about other key climate factors, such
as equilibrium climate sensitivity.

The benefits of research that reduces uncertainty about solar
geoengineering may be more than a thousand times larger than the cost of a
large-scale research programme.

Under-confidence in solar geoengineering’s effectiveness can be as costly
as over-confidence.

The majority of the benefits of reduced uncertainty come from reducing
climate damages rather than from slowing emissions reductions.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-07pxpp%3D-3E861_o6oJvmRGGOkg9baEH%3D%2BCkpecuwLQezw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to