On Thursday 04 December 2008 13:09:20 Justin Deoliveira wrote: > <snip> > > > Yep, pretty much aware of the issues with long freezes. Then again, > > if you don't call "something" people will keep on merrily committing > > changes to the branches we're using for the release no? :) > > So its a darned if you do, darned if you don't situation... not very > nice for the guy doing the release trying to walk the line.
and back to this specific commit, do you think its a good thing to re enable remote ows test on the stable 1.7 branch or we should let that functionality wild? Andrea's original concern was about the quality of such an extensive commit on the wfs module, but the discussion diverged. So we can either: assume its good enough since its what proved to work ok on trunk instead of the unmaintained, obsolete bits that were on 2.5.x. On trunk this already passed Justin's functionality QA, not sure if he did some QA code wise though. Or revert and may be let the issue of enabling the remote ows tests for the next release. Opinions? Cheers, Gabriel > > > Cheers > > Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
