Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> <snip>
>> and back to this specific commit, do you think its a good thing to re enable 
>> remote ows test on the stable 1.7 branch or we should let that functionality 
>> wild?
>> Andrea's original concern was about the quality of such an extensive commit 
>> on 
>> the wfs module, but the discussion diverged. So we can either: assume its 
>> good 
>> enough since its what proved to work ok on trunk instead of the 
>> unmaintained, 
>> obsolete bits that were on 2.5.x. On trunk this already passed Justin's 
>> functionality QA, not sure if he did some QA code wise though. Or revert and 
>> may be let the issue of enabling the remote ows tests for the next release.
>> Opinions?
> 
> Yeah, Gabriels work definitely passes my review. But I still would be 
> hesitant to add to 2.5.x at this point. However... it seems to me that 
> most of the commits (to the wfs xml and emf modules) should not affect 
> geoserver b/c geoserver does not use the wfs xml bindings in geotools?

Oh, I thought they were used, that's why I asked. Sorry for bothering
for nothing then :)
Cheers
Andrea


-- 
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to