Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > <snip> >> and back to this specific commit, do you think its a good thing to re enable >> remote ows test on the stable 1.7 branch or we should let that functionality >> wild? >> Andrea's original concern was about the quality of such an extensive commit >> on >> the wfs module, but the discussion diverged. So we can either: assume its >> good >> enough since its what proved to work ok on trunk instead of the >> unmaintained, >> obsolete bits that were on 2.5.x. On trunk this already passed Justin's >> functionality QA, not sure if he did some QA code wise though. Or revert and >> may be let the issue of enabling the remote ows tests for the next release. >> Opinions? > > Yeah, Gabriels work definitely passes my review. But I still would be > hesitant to add to 2.5.x at this point. However... it seems to me that > most of the commits (to the wfs xml and emf modules) should not affect > geoserver b/c geoserver does not use the wfs xml bindings in geotools?
Oh, I thought they were used, that's why I asked. Sorry for bothering for nothing then :) Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
