Hi Ben,

On 18-02-16 21:41, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> As I hinted above, it might be a very good idea to move your path 
> percent encoding into ResponseUtils.buildURL so all code can benefit. 
> Path elements in URLs muse be encoded when necessary, and until now, 
> GeoServer has gotten away with not doing so because all path elements 
> are unreserved.

I disagree. I think the percent encoding must be kept separate from this 
method, because it can be specific from situation to situation.

Considering that a path string is provided, slashes would need to be 
interpreted as path separators and thus not percent encoded. But if 
someone had slashes in their string that needed to be escaped, they 
would need to encode the string manually. But then this in turn would 
mean that buildURL would do a duplicated percent encoding... which give 
a wrong result. Sure there are always ways to work around it. But for 
maximum flexibility I would keep the things in two separated methods 
that can each be called easily.

>
> Also, ResponseUtils.urlEncode and ResponseUtils.urlDecode use:
> URLEncoder.encode(value, "ISO-8859-1")
> URLDecoder.decode(value, "ISO-8859-1")
> which I think should be changed to "UTF-8". Leaving this as 
> "ISO-8859-1" is going to break a lot more things.
Agreed, this is plain wrong. UTF-8 is the standard for percent encoding.

Regards
Niels

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to